Archive for the ‘Extension Scholarship’ Category

Using Web 2.0 Tools to Teach Knowledge Economy Programming to Extension Professionals

Tuesday, May 8th, 2007

Here at OSU Extension we’re on the cusp of selecting a pilot group of internal students (cutting edge OSU Extension Professionals) to test our ability to teach Knowledge Economy programming via Web 2.0 tools. More information about the program can be found here. An initial source of inspiration came from the Otter Group and their work with the American Library Association (see this link for more on Kathleen Gilroy and the Otter Group). As I’ve repeated for the last year or so, the librarians continue to impress me with their experimentation with newer technologies to reach audiences (see an older post here and a new one here).

We’ve also developed a fairly detailed LOGIC model to measure our longer term impacts. I’ll share more of this as we move ahead. Based on our instructors’ training bootcamp I’m expecting this to be a messy but fun experience. More updates as we move ahead. I’d really like to hear more ideas or input from other Extension Professionals (or other fields for that matter) on related programming.

Applied Research in Extension Article from April Journal of Extension

Saturday, May 5th, 2007

I’m a co-author of a Journal of Extension feature article this month entitled Applied Research Initiative: Training in the Scholarship of Engagement. The article describes a program started in Northwest Ohio in the 1990’s to increase the level of creative and scholarly work by Extension professionals. County level professionals were the primary audience.

One major goal of the program that has generally been successful has been to demonstrate that scholarship and research are already part of local Extension programming, not an additional duty.

One of my co-authors, Cindy Torppa along with Keith Smith and Daney Jackson are moving forward with related ideas in a paper at the next ESP national meeting. We’re still determining future directions, but there are a lot of opportunities for training, collaboration and development. Especially using newer Web 2.0 technologies.

Below is the abstract for our ESP presentation.

Empowering Extension Professionals to Conduct Research

Abstract:

As federal, state, and county budgets tighten, Extension systems across the nation are challenged to find ways to enhance our images with legislators and other stakeholders.  At the same time, there is a growing expectation at all levels of government and community practice that agencies and organizations must be able to demonstrate the value they provide to the citizenry.  Together, these two pressures are making the ability to conduct research critical to Extension’s ongoing success.

Despite these changes, it can be difficult for Extension personnel to come to terms with the need to add this particular set of skills to their repertoire – particularly when so many of us are already stretching our work lives by being asked to do more with less!  In this presentation, we will discuss four aspects of evaluation and outcome research that may help to motivate and inform Extension personnel’s thinking about the need for embedding research practices into their educational programming.

  • First, to document the outcomes from educational programs create.  It is becoming more critical to demonstrate to stakeholders that Extension programs impact clientele in ways that make a meaningful difference.
  • Second, to ensure that the curricula we write and programs we design address the most relevant issues and critical needs of the clientele served.
  • Third, to market Extension.  Strategic marketing is about identifying an audiences’ needs and then showing them how you fulfill them.  By conducting evaluation and applied research that documents the outcomes our programs create, we have the ability to demonstrate to our audiences that we are the source they want to come to get their needs met.
  • Fourth, as identifying funding streams to support Extension programming becomes more critical, basic knowledge of research methods and designs is becoming necessary in order to write successful grant applications.  Many funders now require that grant applications (a) explain the contribution their program and its evaluation will make (b) include a logic model and, (c) many federal grants now require an experimental or quasi-experimental evaluation design in order to demonstrate that a program “causes” the outcomes it claims to produce.

Literature and information will be shared via lecture and discussion with class participation. Resources that Extension professionals can access and use will also be shared.

Extension 2.0 Presentation at this Year’s ESP National Conference

Saturday, April 14th, 2007

My Extension 2.0 paper proposal for this fall’s ESP conference has been accepted. I’ve been actively collecting enterprise 2.0 and web 2.0 type posts, reports, documents, etc. to help prepare for the presentation and some related journal articles. Any ideas, suggestions or just pointing me to new resources is greatly appreciated. Related to this, I’m also part of a team that has a session on virtual work in Extension. For delicious users, here is my current delicious Extension 2.0 list.

Below is the Extension 2.0 abstract:

Extension 2.0? The impact of Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0 and other forces in creating new organizational work structures in Cooperative Extension

Jerold R. Thomas

Ohio State University Extension

Several authors have been writing about structural changes in work environments brought about by new technology, changing demographics, global competition, and external issues like energy costs. This presentation will demonstrate how the Web 2.0 tools can be used and provide recommendations about how Extension systems can use Enterprise 2.0 techniques to improve their efficiency and effectiveness.

Many technology writers (Tim O’Reilly is a leading example) have been discussing a significant change in information technology that has been dubbed Web 2.0. Web 2.0 refers to new online technologies that allow users to interact with writers of web content and each other. Examples include wikis, blogs, podcasting (both audio and video) and other collaborative platforms. Web 2.0 changes the direction of discourse from top down (whoever posts information) to a more collaborative partnership. Early examples in Extension include the structural organization of eXtension. Enterprise 2.0 has followed Web 2.0 as researchers and practitioners look for ways of incorporating Web 2.0 tools into work structures. Leading researchers in this area include McAfee and Lakhani from Harvard University. Enterprise 2.0 is important because it focuses not on the technology, but rather on the technology as a tool to help develop and create systems that make us more effective and efficient. Enterprise 2.0 also encourages the development of systems and structures rather than imposing them.

Other trends that are converging to push society to Enterprise 2.0 functionality include demographics (the increased generational difference in the use of mobile and other electronic media), increasing energy costs that have led to more collaborative and geographically distributed work teams and systems and competition from around the world in adult education and providing of information resources.

The presentation will cover the major trends, address what Web 2.0 is and briefly demonstrate some of the tools (specifically a collaborative program management program, a blog, a collaborative writing instrument teams can use, and podcasts), and then introduce Enterprise 2.0 concepts and their impact on Extension. Dialogue and interaction will be used throughout the presentation, with questions and reflection encouraged.

Summary:

The presentation will cover major trends like technology, demographics, and energy and provide an overview of Enterprise 2.0 theory and how it increases effectiveness in Extension systems. Specific tools that will be demonstrated include: a collaborative program management program, a blog, a collaborative writing instrument teams can use, and podcasts.

Extension 2.0?

Sunday, February 18th, 2007

Continued light blogging from me as I’ve worked on several projects simultaneously. Several of these are related to Web 2.0, distributed/virtual work systems and Extension futures research. One recurring item that I continue to see related to Web 2.0 is the new (fill in the blank)  ___2.0 of everything. Education 2.0 and Enterprise 2.0 are current examples. All feature interesting arguments about how Web 2.0 activities are leading to structural changes in organizations and how we work.  Hopefully I will post more on all of these soon. I’m hoping to use the upcoming ESP 2007 call for papers as a deadline to put together a proposal and potential JOE article on Extension 2.0. This would include the opportunities (I think they are great) and some of the hype. Any feedback is appreciated or comments are appreciated!

For now, here is a link to an interesting Harvard Business School case study on the debate about having an Enterprise 2.0 post on Wikipedia.

Community Development Presentation Opportunities for Extension Professionals

Monday, September 4th, 2006

Both NACDEP (National Association of Community Development Extension Professionals) and CDS (Community Development Society) currently have calls for presentations out for their annual meetings. NACDEP meets in Philadelphia from April 16-19 and CDS meets in Appleton, Wisconsin (with the National Rural Development Partnership – NRDP) on July 17-20. Both are great opportunities for Extension Professionals looking to share programming and research. Or to just attend to network and learn. The NACDEP call is here, the CDS call

here.

 

Increasing the Odds for High-Performance Teams

Friday, September 1st, 2006

This past week I was able to spend parts of three days attending various meetings and workshops on developing high impact teams. Ohio State University Extension hosted Arlen Leholm and Ray Vlasin, authors of the book Increasing the Odds for High-Performance Teams, from Sunday evening through Tuesday. Arlen is the current Dean and Director of Cooperative Extension for the University of Wisconsin and the former Director of Michigan State University Extension. Ray is University Distinguished Professor Emeritus for Michigan State University Extension, the former Director of the Natural Resource Economics Division of USDA’s Economic Research Service, and a Staff Economist for the House Public Works Committee.

It was time well spent. Given the fact that most Extension work is done via teams (and committees) we really need to focus on ways of improving our teams’ performances. As an institution that touts science-based research for decision making, we do a terrible job of actually looking at the literature for teams and applying it to our own work. Leholm and Vlasin do just that in Chapter 2 of their book. This chapter has a very good and very succinct overview of the literature about teams. It is so succinct that it is easy to miss the density of detail it contains. The book also has several case study chapters, including one discussing two Extension High Performance Teams (one at Michigan and the other in Ohio).

The book will be especially valuable for those interested in developing longer term, self-directed teams. Much time was spent discussing the differences between self-directed teams and single-leader teams. And the organizational architecture required to have true self-directed teams. And the time frame – maybe two or more years – to really get the team humming.

So without giving the book’s contents away, here are some key concepts. It is possible for organizations to “increase the odds” of developing high performance teams. But they need to truly empower them, build trust and commitment among team members, and help provide the context to develop clarified and realistic team expectations, rules and team purpose. To be truly self-directed, teams must have an infrastructure to keep them focused on performance. And that infrastructure is their own formalized (read written) purpose and operational statements.

To get a better understanding see this 2004 presentation by Arlen and Ray to. For twenty bucks, the book is a cheap investment for Extension professionals.

Future Educational Trends and myspace

Tuesday, August 22nd, 2006

Ryan Schmiesing (Associate Director, 4-H Youth Development at Ohio State University Extension) and I are in the early stages of developing potential programming about youth using social software. We (Ryan is actually the lead on this) are very interested in curricula for youth, parents and advisors, and how to conduct 4-H related activities on these mediums. The current hot medium is of course myspace. So it was with interest that I found this post by Andy Carvin at learningnow.com. Andy opines about some future trends for the upcoming school year. In particular I find the discussions about the future of myspace and DOPA very interesting. See also the comments that are posted. We need some good, accurate information on social software platforms that youth are using. What are the true risks? What is good public policy (read the Wikipedia article on DOPA and decide for yourself if there is a generation gap)? What do youth need to know about the sites (for example, that anything a youth posts on their or others’ sites will be permanently around in cyberspace. Even if they delete the posting. Imagine a future boss or college admissions officer doing a google search and what can be found.)? How can we use them as tools and resources? Lot’s of opportunities for research, programming and curricula for Extension.

Day 1 at NETC

Tuesday, May 9th, 2006

Day one of the NETC conference is over. So far it has been an interesting conference. I’m enjoying the networking and have attended several good sessions. Here are some tidbits from the day.

A good opening session that allowed brief remarks by Larry Arrington, Dean for Extension, University of Florida /IFAS. Dean Arrington had two really interesting points. First, he commented that he used to feel like Extension in Florida was keeping ahead of their clientele with technology. Not so anymore – it is almost impossible to do so. But, he also announced a new UF Extension webpage called “solutions for your life” that goes online in the next week or so. His description sounds exciting and I’m looking forward to finding out more about it.

Dan Cotton also gave an overview of eXtension. 2005 was the forming year for eXension, 2006 is the year to build up the content and populate the site, and 2007 is scheduled for the formal unveiling to the public. The activity level really seems to be cranking up and several sessions at the conference are devoted to eXtension topics.

I attended two interesting sessions in the afternoon. Anne Adrian from Auburn gave an interesting paper on the decision making process for adopting new technologies. She borrows research from the medical and psychological fields that focus on the steps people go through to seek treatment. It also led me to a discussion with Bruce Emmons from NC State about his past dissertation work on computer anxiety and communication styles. More to add to the reading pile.

Finally, the last session I attended had several interesting points on distance learning and education. Howard Beck from Florida and Kathy Wright from Kansas State discussed a current program using streaming video and audio. The big value for me was in the discussions on concept mapping and educational design. Kathy also introduced some concepts from a book by Clark and Mayer that I need to get my hands on.

A very productive and worthwhile first day! More updates as the conference moves along.

OSU Extension Knowledge Economy Programming

Saturday, May 6th, 2006

I’ve been extremely busy and blogging lightly over the last several weeks. One group of projects that have taken some of my time focus around the Knowledge Economy (KE). OSU Extension now has a website up and running (with a blog) to help bring together people interested in the KE. We’ve also completed our first convening meeting of faculty, staff and students from Ohio State that are interested in the KE. The conference drew about 85 people from 11 different colleges. Two-page roundtable papers and video podcasts of OSU President Karen Holbrook and OSU Extension Director Keith Smith will also be posted to the site.

I hope that OSU Extension’s programming in the KE area proves to be an example of multi-disciplinary programming involving professionals from across the campus.

Why More Federal Research Dollars Might Materialize

Tuesday, April 11th, 2006

Seed magazine has a an interesting post about the Bush administration’s new commitment to funding research. The reason? The book “The World is Flat” and a National Academies report. I listened to the article as a podcast, but you can read it at the link below. The article contains a link to the National Academies summary that contains some very useful data related to human capacity, innovation, etc. for the Knowledge Economy.

The link: http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2006/03/going_where_no_report_has_gone.php?page=1